STEEL LINE for the future and internationell connections
Guideline values for the different modes of transport will be the basis for the calculations made and comparisons between different destinations. It is not a scientific report but can give a quick idea of the energy consumption and a comparison between the modes of transport. It may not be what everyone thinks and the impression you get in the press
The flight
There are no real figures today as the flight is not really able to transport passengers according to what it could be done when using other fuels and not electric propulsion.
What is on the table today are aircraft with a range of 250 km and passenger numbers of 20 to 50 people. Lacks the real energy consumption and is today a desktop product. Will not materialize in the near future. Electric flight is nothing to count on for a long time and will not be for longer distances at all.
Compilation of energy consumption per passenger
Transportation options | X 2000 | Intercity tåg | Ordinary passenger train | Tesla | InfraMag train |
Energy consumption/person | 0,73 kWh | 0,8 kWh | 1,2 kWh | 1 passenger 2 kWh
4 passenger 0,5 kWh |
0,05 - 0,12 kWh |
CO2 emissions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other emissions | No | No | No | Fine health-hazardous particles from, among other things, the rubber wheels | No |
The above figures show that Tesla's choice as an environmental alternative is no better than what the train provides. If you add to that that there are other environmentally dangerous emissions from Tesla, such as the fine particles that come from the contact of the rubber wheels with the road surface and the dangerous microparticles that are spread, then Tesla is not the environmental argument that is spread by the press.
created with
Best Free Website Builder .